Categorized | Sport

Man City’s YouTube Partnership: An In-Depth Look

Man City’s YouTube Partnership: An In-Depth Look

It has been well publicised recently that the world’s richest football club has taken the step of getting a YouTube brand channel.  To many this may get a ‘so what’ reaction and many of the articles so far have only mentioned the news but not looked into what this means to the club and for football.

If this had been in any other industry it would not make the news as most decent sized businesses have their own channel that they spend extra on to make it look cool.

But this is football and so far they have stuck to basic marketing strategies and the biggest marketing costs they will have is a club website.  Most have now (with some prodding) ventured into the new domains of Facebook and Twitter but YouTube has been largely forgotten about. But why?

This is a hard one for clubs.  They are watched on TV by millions of people, at least twice a week these days, with the games being beamed all over the world.  But, and it is a big BUT, they don’t own any of the match footage.  This is controlled by the Premier League and broadcasters and there are numerous deals in place.

One slightly odd possibility is, though I’ve never seen the contracts (strangely enough), is that any match footage is not allowed to be shown on social media platforms.  It may sound strange but am 95% sure on this one that is true.

So this leaves clubs with only their own content to use.  What this does is narrow down the field of who is likely to produce their own content and use a video platform to the big clubs.  Those who have their own TV studios and channels, usually on their website.  Those clubs such as Man Utd, City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool.

One thing to point at this stage is that gaining a YouTube brand channel is not cheap and certainly not free (sorry to those were getting excited about what they can do with a channel).  This is another restrictor when it comes to which clubs will follow suit with City.

What City have done, and managed to leap in front of the rest in the process, is take it seriously as an additional revenue generator and seen the possibilities.  They started slowly with a normal ‘official’ YouTube channel, much the same as any of us can set up if we so wish.

This allowed them to give away content that would otherwise sit on their CityTV channel being played out to a small audience.  When you are building from scratch to develop a global brand as City are, then reaching out to new fans is a must and YouTube allows that to happen.

Now they have over 4,000 subscribers to the channel and deliver regular (good) content that fans are interested in then they have been able to take the next step. A Brand Channel!

So what does this allow them to do now?

Basically it allows the club to customise how their page looks and what it can do including the channel banners, background image and branding box.  They can also moderate comments and automatically redirect people depending on there geographical location (could be a good one for the future).  It also opens up the possibilities with gadgets (opening up YouTube’s API), syndication (channel can live anywhere on the web) and metrics.  I am a fan of ‘annotations’ which allow the linking off to other videos/sites via clickable links within the video, something you only get with a brand channel.

This last one is key to any brand being on the platform.  It gives you great information on how videos (and the channel) is performing.  It can also tell you more about the content you are putting up and how engaged with it people find it.

They have already made changes to the page with links to areas of their website.  I especially like the map integration where you can buy tickets for upcoming games (as you can see below)…

There are opportunities to get even more creative as time goes by and we’ll see how it goes, as am sure other clubs will be doing.  What it does open up when it comes to revenue, I’ve finally got round to mentioning it, is the advertising/sponsorship opportunities it presents.

They can look at running sponsors messaging on their site, incorporate annotation links within videos, have a company sponsor their page and open up another opportunity, link off to sponsor channels/videos….. there is a lot they can do to monetise this space.

Here’s what those involved had to say about the partnership;

Richard Ayers, Head of Digital, for Manchester City (who has been nominated for a DADI award!), said:

“Manchester City is having a phenomenal year of growth and development online. Our goal is to deliver a market leading experience for fans in terms of online video.  That means delivering the great content we make to where the audience is – i.e. on YouTube. This deal is the first move in laying the foundations of our syndication strategy and is part of a series of deals to expand our online capabilities. The ability to extend our reach and to increase accessibility to audiences is great, but we’re also looking forward to exploring the differentiating factors of YouTube, like using annotations, making bespoke interactive video and, more than anything else, becoming part of the thriving YouTube community.”

Jeff Nathenson, Head of Sports Partnerships for YouTube, said:

“We are excited that Manchester City has become the first English Premier League club to become a commercial partner with YouTube.  They are proving to be an exciting club both on the pitch and in the digital media space.  We believe this kind of deal will have a global impact, allowing them to reach new fans in new territories with compelling original content.”

To finish, here are some examples of cool brand channels and what City could look to achieve (if they want to spend the money on doing it).  Its great to see them pushing the boundaries and hopefully they will pull others with them.

 

 

 

 

 

This post was written by:

- who has written 319 posts on UKSN – The Social Media & Sport Site.

Founder of ‘UK Sports Network’ and Head of Social Media at digital media company Pulse. Formerly of Carat UK, We Are Social and Copa90. A lover of all sports, player of a few and ardent Manchester United fan. Follow me at @danielmclaren for insights into social media, football and many other random things.

Contact the author

anon says:

Any idea how much YouTube charges for these types of channels?

Dan (UKSN) says:

its all about media spend rather than a charge for a channel. anyone can start a youtube channel but the increase in spend unlocks more options to customise. its not cheap, hence why only brands have gone down this route so far

Mike Dunphy says:

How does it differ in principle from the existing Chelsea FC Channel?

admin says:

Chelsea have a basic YouTube page set up rather than the brand partnership Man City now have. Chelsea wont have the same ability to customise their page, include extra content (like the map on Cities and links to web pages), wont have annotations or the same insights available.

I think long term we will see more clubs take up this option as the rewards are greater than the cost involved. Having used the accounts of my clients for a while now it does make a difference and makes it a much more viable channel to monetise/be useful.

Dan

Dan (UKSN) says:

Hi Mike. Chelsea's channel has been reskinned but the functionality is very much the same as any other basic YT channel. City have unlocked more features and this gives them optionsin what they do with it. It becomes more part of a strategy and can incorporate cool features which drive to other areas too, rather than just being an end destination for peices of video content.

stua says:

Other than sponsorship and ads what other revenue opportunities do they have? Alternative delivery opportunities like this will be critical in the context of the Liverpool current debate!

Dave Lowe says:

Another great article from Dan – it's great to finally see the spectre of match footage rights no longer hanging over UK sports club's attempts to exploit what is an exciting opportunity to expand reach and add value to fans' experiences.

Dan (UKSN) says:

Thanks Dave. Match footage is always going to prove an issue but there is so much more content that a club like City has to offer. Can they monetise it? I think they can and will depend if they want to.

pedro redig says:

Dan, nice article. You have great insight and views of the interaction between media and what it can do for a football club. Bests!

Dan (UKSN) says:

Thanks Pedro :)

Socialmediatoday.com Member

Archive Posts

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline